Annual Exhibition of Tartu Artists

The annual exhibition of Tartu artists, functioning on the basis of an open call, is an old format not so common in the contemporary context. Traditionally the works selected by the jury formed the exhibition.

This structure of free submission of works chosen by aesthetic value lost its adequateness a long time ago, but not in the context of Tartu. Here the traditional value systems are rather hermetical and mummified, and the annual exhibition format has still its role to play, judging by the sole fact that every year it is the most visited exhibition.

Since there are none common aesthetic values to agree upon, the exhibition format could not function anymore, supported solely by the need to somehow symbolically monitor the diversity of the local art scene. Having tried to reform the format in different ways Tartu Art House recently settled on a designer led exhibition solution. To put it short, works are gathered on the principle of open call, just the traditional jury’s place is taken by an exhibition designer, who chooses the works, and designs the exhibition according to his/ her vision.

Video artist and painter Jaan Toomik was invited for collaboration in year 2012. Having looked at the works, he made a principal decision not to leave out any authors, finding himself in a situation with 98 authors and altogether ca 150 works (of which 106 got exhibited) that had in common not so much more than the sole fact of their existence. Thereby comes the biggest problem – how to arrange the exposition of this whole of works but avoid paradoxes in it that would cause misinterpretation of the original idea. I must say Toomik managed to solve the situation and proved that the format can work. We might not be used to it anymore, but it is still possible to go to an exhibition and watch individual works hanging on the wall, rather than looking at the exhibition space as a conceptual whole, which for contemporary critics such as myself, is normally the only way to perceive an exhibition. So in a way Toomik’s design opened for me a way of looking at art I had not forgotten, but never actually known.

The exhibition is set together from authors and works which follow the open call, so the annual exhibitions representativeness depends on who is willing to participate. In this respect it does not give a 100% overview of the art scene in Tartu. Missing, for example, text based conceptualism, which takes remarkable place in overview exhibitions of Estonian contemporary art. In this particular case, this is the only thing missing as other tendencies are in the show, though not represented in the best possible way perhaps.

Tartu is famous for its stencil based street art, which has found its way to halls of Kumu Art Museum in Tallinn, and was reproduced (the proper way, without asking, in the night before the opening) on Tartu Art House wall. Art Collage sculpture department have been saving place for the best Estonian young sculptures, but this year the professors were lazy and the students no good. But, for example, Tartu University painting department made a good impression as well as the private school for amateur painters Konrad Mägi Studio. So one can say painting dominates in this year’s exhibition, underlying the legend Tartu being a city of painters.

Jaan Toomik himself while designing the exhibition verbalised two main tendencies – landscape in different forms and body-centered model handling where the surrounding is forgotten altogether. This formed the central opposition of exhibition taking up the main hall. Everything else was displayed discretely, according to aesthetics.

 

The exhibition is open on 22.12. 2012. – 13.01. 2013 at Tartu Art House (Vanemuine 26, Tartu)

01

Exhibition designer Jaan Toomik standing on Kristina Sokolova’s work “Stair”.

003

Installing the exhibition.

002

Installing the exhibition.

004

One of renown Stencyl artist’s in Tartu, MinajaLydia’s “Myrtle Corbin”.

05

Eva-Leena Miksson “Give me time to set the plowshare”, a typical but rather mediocre example of Tartu Art Collage sculpture department works, but here bay one must admit that all of the good sculptors who have grown out of the Art Colledge have reached their maturity when in MA studies at Estonian Academy of Arts.

006

Laura Põld “House”. One of the most interesting graduates of Tartu University painting department (MA 2009.). Currently lives and works in Vienna.

007

View of the landscape section.

008

Opposite to landscapes’ placed are the model studies, that are mostly practised in Tartu University painting department.

009

Toomik avoided any paradox situations in the design, but even he could not escape some.

0010

Ago Teedemaa “Old Jacket of poet Juhan Liiv” – a very remarkable work in the oeuvre of Teedemaa alhtough that does not make it important in neither international or Estonian art context, but does not decrease its value in the context of Tartu. The annual exhibition is local and provincial in its ideas, but Jaan Toomik’s design, which forces one to look and value every work individually rather than the exhibition as a whole, proved that the format can still work and has, in a local and, dare say, provincial context, its function and meaning.

0011

“Untitled” by Jevgeny Zolotko and Peeter Krosmann is the most critical and reflective work in the whole exhibition. Being a a post-impressionistic painter, Krosmann faces a dilemma as post-impressionistic painting as such is totally incommunicable in the context of contemporary art and should not be exhibited. Therefore Krosman destroyed one of his landscape paintings with a paper smasher and asked Zolotko (an acknowledged contemporary sculptor) to put it together again which the latter did and presented this reconstructed work in a box, with a text including author’s biography and description of the motive depicted in the painting. Thus he forced the landscape in the dialogue with the value system of contemporary art.
A clever and critical move. The truth is always a bit brutal, but in this case it is brutal also towards the traditional values. It turns out that conceptualism too is nothing more then a set of aesthetic values according to which one has to build up one’s work to be taken as art.

0012

Peeter Krosmann and Jevgeny Zolotko

Photographs by Indrek Grigor

Artists: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Indrek Grigor
Author
January 6, 2013
Published in Review from Estonia
0 Comments
Social share
Share Button
Print friendly version Print friendly version